From owner-freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 5 04:38:01 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B915C16A400 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 04:38:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pho@holm.cc) Received: from relay00.pair.com (relay00.pair.com [209.68.5.9]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7209413C447 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 04:38:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pho@holm.cc) Received: (qmail 24978 invoked from network); 5 Jun 2007 04:37:59 -0000 Received: from 83.95.197.164 (HELO peter.osted.lan) (83.95.197.164) by relay00.pair.com with SMTP; 5 Jun 2007 04:37:59 -0000 X-pair-Authenticated: 83.95.197.164 Received: from peter.osted.lan (localhost.osted.lan [127.0.0.1]) by peter.osted.lan (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l554bxRf099794; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 06:37:59 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from pho@peter.osted.lan) Received: (from pho@localhost) by peter.osted.lan (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id l554bwOI099793; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 06:37:58 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from pho) Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2007 06:37:58 +0200 From: Peter Holm To: Nate Lawson Message-ID: <20070605043758.GA99622@peter.osted.lan> References: <20070604183419.GA73268@peter.osted.lan> <46646BD3.5080900@root.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <46646BD3.5080900@root.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Possible ACPI relared panic with Tyan S2720 X-BeenThere: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: ACPI and power management development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 04:38:01 -0000 On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 12:45:23PM -0700, Nate Lawson wrote: > Peter Holm wrote: > > I have a panic that comes and go. Kostik has helped me narrow the > > problem down to AcpiOsWritePort(). > > > > It is not a problem for me, as there are various was to work around > > it. > > > > More info can be found here: http://people.freebsd.org/~pho/acpi.html > > Thanks for all your debugging effort. > You are welcome :-) > This is a really confusing issue. All the trace you have shows is that > it occurs while transitioning the system from legacy to ACPI mode. > Unfortunately, the details of what is going on are hidden in the BIOS > since that write to a port triggers an SMI and the BIOS does the rest. > > However, it seems like the BIOS is reserving more memory, using memory > it didn't reserve, or FreeBSD is using memory we shouldn't. John, any > insight on the SMAP output? > > > SMAP type=01 base=0000000000000000 len=000000000009fc00 > > SMAP type=02 base=000000000009fc00 len=0000000000000400 > > SMAP type=02 base=00000000000e0000 len=0000000000020000 > > SMAP type=01 base=0000000000100000 len=000000003fef0000 > > SMAP type=03 base=000000003fff0000 len=000000000000f000 > > SMAP type=04 base=000000003ffff000 len=0000000000001000 > > SMAP type=02 base=00000000fec00000 len=0000000000100000 > > SMAP type=02 base=00000000fee00000 len=0000000000001000 > > SMAP type=02 base=00000000fff80000 len=0000000000080000 > > Peter, can you figure out what phys address is getting overwritten? > Seems like it's the loader that sets up the module list and the loader's > allocator may be using RAM it shouldn't. > If I did it right (I used a vtophys() on the address): Address of mod->name(if_tun): 0xc3eed5ec, phys: 0x985ec - Peter