From owner-freebsd-hackers Sun Mar 28 6:17: 4 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from rt2.synx.com (tech.boostworks.com [194.167.81.239]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D398315690 for ; Sun, 28 Mar 1999 06:16:19 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from root@synx.com) Received: from synx.com (rn.synx.com [192.1.1.241]) by rt2.synx.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id QAA22223; Sun, 28 Mar 1999 16:22:40 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: <199903281422.QAA22223@rt2.synx.com> Date: Sun, 28 Mar 1999 16:14:17 +0200 (CEST) From: Remy Nonnenmacher Reply-To: remy@synx.com Subject: Re: ipfw behavior, is it normal? To: ru@ucb.crimea.ua Cc: noor@NetVision.net.il, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <19990328171210.A55135@relay.ucb.crimea.ua> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On 28 Mar, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > On Sun, Mar 28, 1999 at 04:00:58PM +0200, Remy Nonnenmacher wrote: >> On 28 Mar, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: >> > Hi! >> > >> > You've screwed your rules up ;-) >> > Rules 400 and 500 are `allow tcp', I suppose. >> > Send us your _real_ rules first. >> > >> >> I think these *ARE* the real rules. Anyway, 'IP' matches all packets.. >> > > You think wrong. I mean: > > # ipfw add 00500 allow ip from any to 1.2.3.4 21 in via xl0 > ipfw: error: only TCP and UDP protocols are valid with port specifications > > Bingo !! [Poor checking...Baf...Baf...] ;). Thanks Ruslan. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message