From owner-freebsd-python@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 23 11:44:04 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: python@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-python@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9250816A401; Tue, 23 Jan 2007 11:44:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vd@datamax.bg) Received: from jengal.datamax.bg (jengal.datamax.bg [82.103.104.21]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48B7C13C45E; Tue, 23 Jan 2007 11:44:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vd@datamax.bg) Received: from qlovarnika.bg.datamax (qlovarnika.bg.datamax [192.168.10.2]) by jengal.datamax.bg (Postfix) with SMTP id 591E7B848; Tue, 23 Jan 2007 13:44:03 +0200 (EET) Received: (nullmailer pid 41492 invoked by uid 1002); Tue, 23 Jan 2007 11:44:03 -0000 Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 13:44:03 +0200 From: Vasil Dimov To: Pav Lucistnik Message-ID: <20070123114403.GA41450@qlovarnika.bg.datamax> References: <20070123104738.GA41157@qlovarnika.bg.datamax> <1169549704.6221.10.camel@pav.hide.vol.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="/04w6evG8XlLl3ft" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1169549704.6221.10.camel@pav.hide.vol.cz> Cc: gnome@FreeBSD.org, ports-developers@FreeBSD.org, python@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: The way to fix ports/104560 X-BeenThere: freebsd-python@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: vd@FreeBSD.org List-Id: FreeBSD-specific Python issues List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 11:44:04 -0000 --/04w6evG8XlLl3ft Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Jan 23, 2007 at 11:55:04 +0100, Pav Lucistnik wrote: > Vasil Dimov p??e v ?t 23. 01. 2007 v 12:47 +0200: >=20 > > Please take a look at ports/104560 (and also ports/105853 and > > ports/106120) and come to a consensus what is the right way to fix this > > issue. > >=20 > > I am sure we can come to an agreement and shortly commit a fix. >=20 > As I see it: >=20 > - lang/python metaport must be removed I am not sure what it is used for, I cannot say myself. > - all lang/python2? ports will install $PREFIX/bin/python binary This makes sense. x11-toolkits/py-gtk2 may not be the only one which expects bin/python to be present. [...] > Or if people absolutely need to have several different pythons on a > system, make the bin/python automatical symlink, like in perl ports. Sure. --=20 Vasil Dimov gro.DSBeerF@dv % Everyone who has lived has died, but not everyone who has died has lived. --/04w6evG8XlLl3ft Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iD4DBQFFtfUDFw6SP/bBpCARAgh3AJjnJ2E+kTpy+On5OmqOl9z7eOfcAJ93dF+3 ezjSq0RminufCpygFo0tkg== =q8kl -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --/04w6evG8XlLl3ft--