From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 2 21:45:15 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B57410656AA for ; Thu, 2 Dec 2010 21:45:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fidaj@ukr.net) Received: from fsm1.ukr.net (fsm1.ukr.net [195.214.192.23]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B8F58FC27 for ; Thu, 2 Dec 2010 21:45:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from 47-39-132-95.pool.ukrtel.net ([95.132.39.47] helo=localhost) by fsm1.ukr.net with esmtps ID 1POGbP-0005oe-WF for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Thu, 02 Dec 2010 23:22:08 +0200 Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2010 23:22:06 +0200 From: Ivan Klymenko To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20101202232206.66c672a1@ukr.net> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.6 (GTK+ 2.20.1; amd64-portbld-freebsd9.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: ftp/proftpd 1.3.3c with a version which contained a backdoor. X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2010 21:45:15 -0000 Hello, people! What do you think is it worth to pay attention to these events: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_name=alpine.DEB.2.00.1012011542220.12930%40familiar.castaglia.org and that in this case needs to be done with the port ftp/proftpd itself? Thanks!