From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 25 17:04:59 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96E4F106566B; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 17:04:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from conrads@cox.net) Received: from eastrmfepo103.cox.net (eastrmfepo103.cox.net [68.230.241.215]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02E598FC12; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 17:04:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from eastrmimpo210.cox.net ([68.230.241.225]) by eastrmfepo103.cox.net (InterMail vM.8.01.04.00 201-2260-137-20101110) with ESMTP id <20120125170440.SHMD28068.eastrmfepo103.cox.net@eastrmimpo210.cox.net>; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 12:04:40 -0500 Received: from serene.no-ip.org ([98.164.86.55]) by eastrmimpo210.cox.net with bizsmtp id Rt4S1i00M1BeFqy02t4Y4A; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 12:04:39 -0500 X-CT-Class: Clean X-CT-Score: 0.00 X-CT-RefID: str=0001.0A020209.4F203627.00F0,ss=1,re=0.000,fgs=0 X-CT-Spam: 0 X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=LJ9IO+3242BRBuyNVs8xk1samR36zHaHHsCDtW+WEMA= c=1 sm=1 a=EnZeqY4DioAA:10 a=G8Uczd0VNMoA:10 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=fdHYxQQoAueMHNSmXppgDg==:17 a=6I5d2MoRAAAA:8 a=kviXuzpPAAAA:8 a=xIWn2VyaM7zYHat52bAA:9 a=PKZt845WebUd2xDhRvcA:7 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=SV7veod9ZcQA:10 a=4vB-4DCPJfMA:10 a=fdHYxQQoAueMHNSmXppgDg==:117 X-CM-Score: 0.00 Authentication-Results: cox.net; none Received: from cox.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by serene.no-ip.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q0PH4Lsi010467; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 11:04:22 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from conrads@cox.net) Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 11:04:16 -0600 From: "Conrad J. Sabatier" To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20120125110416.1e23c756@cox.net> In-Reply-To: References: <20120124081905.5f497763@cox.net> <4F1F153A.50004@FreeBSD.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.0 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd10.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: Chris Rees , Doug Barton Subject: Re: "portmaster -o" behaves a little strangely (IMHO) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 17:04:59 -0000 On Tue, 24 Jan 2012 22:01:33 +0000 Chris Rees wrote: > On 24 January 2012 20:31, Doug Barton wrote: > > On 01/24/2012 06:19, Conrad J. Sabatier wrote: > >> =3D=3D=3D>>> Gathering dependency list for lang/gcc46 from ports > >> =3D=3D=3D>>> Launching child to update gcc-4.4.7.20111108 to > >> gcc-4.4.7.20120117 > >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 lang/gcc46 >> gcc-4.4.7.20111108 > >> > >> (What is the preceding line -- with the ">>" -- and the similar one > >> below, supposed to be indicating exactly? =A0If it means what I > >> think it does, then it seems as if portmaster is misinterpreting > >> the intention of the "-o" option) > > > > No, it means that the ports framework is seeing 4.4 as a dependency > > of 4.6 for some reason. I've seen that happen in the past when > > non-base gcc was in use, but have never had anyone track down the > > cause authoritatively. Obviously make.conf is a suspect, but I'm > > assuming you already looked there. >=20 > Often happens when people stick USE_something into make.conf :) >=20 > (don't do that) >=20 > Chris Hmmm, interesting. I do, in fact, have a USE_GCC=3D4.2+ line in /etc/make.conf, conditional on ${.CURDIR} for certain ports that just won't build with clang, which I'm using now as the default. Doug seems to think, though, that it's something else within the ports framework's handling of the gcc ports that's tripping up portmaster. Not sure I even want to begin to try to track that one down. :-) Anyway, thanks everybody for the feedback. --=20 Conrad J. Sabatier conrads@cox.net