Date: Wed, 18 Feb 1998 17:35:03 -0500 (EST) From: Tim Vanderhoek <ac199@hwcn.org> To: Matt Behrens <matt@zigg.com> Cc: ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Jordan's challenge (imap-uw) Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.96.980218172948.191D-100000@localhost> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.96.980218001543.15082A-100000@megaweapon.zigg.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 18 Feb 1998, Matt Behrens wrote:
> I suppose we'd really want the c-client shared library working, ideally;
> esp. considering possible high load conditions; but on my little ol' box
I doubt it's worth it. Dyson has repeatedly given reasons why
shared-libs are over-rated, especially in a case such as this
(few client programs). In addition to imap-uw, the only port
using c-client that I know of is tkrat. It'd be nice if the
c-client headers were installed in a subdir of inclue/. Or,
break c-client out as a separate port.
> what was breaking the current port. I won't comment about software
> maintainers changing file structures so radically and not even changing
> the tarball name except to say "Yeesh".
You're being gentle.
--
tIM...HOEk
OPTIMIZATION: the process of using many one-letter variables names
hoping that the resultant code will run faster.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.96.980218172948.191D-100000>