From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Sep 30 19:57: 2 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mail5.speakeasy.net (mail5.speakeasy.net [216.254.0.205]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EE0837B40A for ; Sun, 30 Sep 2001 19:54:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 98056 invoked from network); 1 Oct 2001 02:54:52 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mgm) ([66.92.216.5]) (envelope-sender ) by mail5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 1 Oct 2001 02:54:52 -0000 Message-ID: <009001c14a24$7c334f20$05d85c42@speakeasy.net> Reply-To: "jason" From: "jason" To: Subject: Problems after IP change Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2001 22:55:08 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200 Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Due to the problems after the NYC incident back on 9/11 my ISP has made many changes in my configuration to get my service back. They immediately moved my circuit from NYC (New York) to WDC (Washington DC) which allowed me to keep same IP there was quite a bit of congestion. Well last week they said they were moving some of us to SEA (Seattle) which would require an IP change. This switch was not successfully accomplished yet. Here is the details. I am running two BSD machines. One with 4.2 and the other with 4.3. Each was the latest release at the time of install. They were both up and running fine with the old static addresses of 216.27.148.134 and 216.27.148.138. At present these are the only two BSD machines on the network but there are several Win9x machines running. I set these IP addresses in /etc using a file called start_if. For one it is called start_if.dc0 and the other start_if.lnc0. The entry in dc0 machine was: ifconfig dc0 inet 216.27.148.134 216.27.148.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 ifconfig dc0 inet 192.168.1.103 192.168.1.1 netmask 255.255.255.255 alias The entry in lnc0 machine was: ifconfig dc0 inet 216.27.148.138 216.27.148.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 ifconfig dc0 inet 192.168.1.104 192.168.1.1 netmask 255.255.255.255 alias These worked just fine when I was connected to NYC then WDC. I added the 192.168 address to allow machines using my other second DSL line to have an address in their subnet they can connect to. Otherwise if they use the real internet IP the connections will go out one DSL line and through the internet than back on the other DSL line which wastes precious DSL bandwidth. When I was told of the migration to SEA I changed the start_if files. The IP change was temporary so I commented out the old IP addresses so I didn't have to delete the line. This would make switching back far easier. The entry in dc0 machine became: #ifconfig dc0 inet 216.27.148.134 216.27.148.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 ifconfig dc0 inet 66.92.216.2 66.92.216.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 #ifconfig dc0 inet 192.168.1.103 192.168.1.1 netmask 255.255.255.255 alias The entry in lnc0 machine became: #ifconfig lnc0 inet 216.27.148.138 216.27.148.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 ifconfig lnc0 inet 66.92.216.6 66.92.216.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 #ifconfig lnc0 inet 192.168.1.104 192.168.1.1 netmask 255.255.255.255 alias I was able to ping any 66.92.216.0 address but unable to ping past that point. My ISP support department indicated that they seen my ARP messages hitting their gateway but when they logged into the gateway and tried to ping my addresses they did not respond. I verified this my trying to ping from another connection outside my LAN to these addresses. I traced the connection and found I was making it to the gateway but everything timed out then. These machines would respond to pings if initiated on the same LAN. It was as if the computers refused to communicate with anyone not on the local LAN. I later commented out all lines except for the one ifconfig line that had each machines 66.92.216.0 address. This had no affect. Here is the ifconifg command from lnc0 at present: > ifconfig lnc0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 inet 66.92.216.6 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 66.92.216.1 inet6 fe80::280:5fff:fef4:1042%lnc0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x1 ether 00:80:5f:f4:10:42 lp0: flags=8810 mtu 1500 faith0: flags=8000 mtu 1500 gif0: flags=8010 mtu 1280 gif1: flags=8010 mtu 1280 gif2: flags=8010 mtu 1280 gif3: flags=8010 mtu 1280 lo0: flags=8049 mtu 16384 inet6 fe80::1%lo0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x8 inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128 inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff000000 ppp0: flags=8010 mtu 1500 sl0: flags=c010 mtu 552 > And here is the same thing for dc0: dc0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 inet 66.92.216.2 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 66.92.216.1 inet6 fe80::220:78ff:fe08:9fc%dc0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x1 inet 66.92.216.3 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 66.92.216.1 inet 66.92.216.4 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 66.92.216.1 inet 66.92.216.9 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 66.92.216.1 inet 66.92.216.10 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 66.92.216.1 inet 66.92.216.11 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 66.92.216.1 inet 192.168.1.103 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.1.1 ether 00:20:78:08:09:fc media: autoselect (100baseTX) status: active supported media: autoselect 100baseTX 100baseTX 10baseT/UT P 10baseT/UTP none lp0: flags=8810 mtu 1500 faith0: flags=8000 mtu 1500 gif0: flags=8010 mtu 1280 gif1: flags=8010 mtu 1280 gif2: flags=8010 mtu 1280 gif3: flags=8010 mtu 1280 lo0: flags=8049 mtu 16384 inet6 fe80::1%lo0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x8 inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128 inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff000000 ppp0: flags=8010 mtu 1500 sl0: flags=c010 mtu 552 2:45am ftp:~ > Several windows machines were affected by the IP change and they are now all up and running. Anyone have any ideas what might be the problem? What could have gone wrong here? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message