Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 4 May 2017 16:51:23 +0200
From:      Olavi Kumpulainen <olavi.m.kumpulainen@gmail.com>
To:        freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   cpsw drops packets when stressed on BBB and 11.0-STABLE
Message-ID:  <25b417df-9073-0e3e-39f7-64ca241d516d@gmail.com>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi,

I'm running a snapshot build of FreeBSD-11,
FreeBSD beaglebone 11.0-STABLE FreeBSD 11.0-STABLE #0 r317153: Thu Apr 
20 09:21:26 UTC 2017
root@releng2.nyi.freebsd.org:/usr/obj/arm.armv6/usr/src/sys/BEAGLEBONE arm

on a BBB.

I see that cpsw drops outgoing packets when stressed.

Out of some reason, dev.cpswss.0.stats.RxStartOfFrameOverruns increments 
when packets are dropped which may be a hint on what’s going on.

The fact that RxStartOf... increases is confusing, because the packets 
seem to be dropped in transmission.

Anyway - I’ve found a simple way to reproduce the problem, namely by 
sending long pings.

On the BBB:

# tcpdump -ni cpsw0 icmp&

Initial state of RxStartOfFrameOverruns in BBB after playing around a bit:

# sysctl dev.cpswss.0.stats.RxStartOfFrameOverruns
dev.cpswss.0.stats.RxStartOfFrameOverruns: 86

# ping -c 1 -s 14000 192.168.0.3

PING 192.168.0.3 (192.168.0.3): 14000 data bytes

11:36:57.965980 IP 192.168.0.158 > 192.168.0.3: ICMP echo request, id 
53762, seq 0, length 1480
11:36:57.966658 IP 192.168.0.158 > 192.168.0.3: ip-proto-1
11:36:57.966826 IP 192.168.0.158 > 192.168.0.3: ip-proto-1
11:36:57.966923 IP 192.168.0.158 > 192.168.0.3: ip-proto-1
11:36:57.967009 IP 192.168.0.158 > 192.168.0.3: ip-proto-1
11:36:57.967090 IP 192.168.0.158 > 192.168.0.3: ip-proto-1
11:36:57.967173 IP 192.168.0.158 > 192.168.0.3: ip-proto-1
11:36:57.967254 IP 192.168.0.158 > 192.168.0.3: ip-proto-1
11:36:57.967336 IP 192.168.0.158 > 192.168.0.3: ip-proto-1
11:36:57.967414 IP 192.168.0.158 > 192.168.0.3: ip-proto-1

(10 packets has supposedly been put into the tx ring in BBB)

Looking at RxStartOfFrameOverruns in the BBB, I see an increment by 5…

#sysctl dev.cpswss.0.stats.RxStartOfFrameOverruns
dev.cpswss.0.stats.RxStartOfFrameOverruns: 91

I've set up a tcpdump on the target machine:

$ sudo tcpdump -ni eth2 icmp
13:52:42.603199 IP 192.168.0.158 > 192.168.0.3: ICMP echo request, id 
53762, seq 0, length 1480
13:52:42.604697 IP 192.168.0.158 > 192.168.0.3: ip-proto-1

(Eight fragments lost!)

Without tcpump in BBB, more packets seem to go through (showing tcpdump 
on target);

13:56:08.396553 IP 192.168.0.158 > 192.168.0.3: ICMP echo request, id 
55554, seq 0, length 1480
13:56:08.397781 IP 192.168.0.158 > 192.168.0.3: ip-proto-1
13:56:08.399029 IP 192.168.0.158 > 192.168.0.3: ip-proto-1
13:56:08.400157 IP 192.168.0.158 > 192.168.0.3: ip-proto-1
13:56:08.401409 IP 192.168.0.158 > 192.168.0.3: ip-proto-1

(Five packets lost)

Again, there's an increment in RxStartOfFrame...:

# sysctl dev.cpswss.0.stats.RxStartOfFrameOverruns
dev.cpswss.0.stats.RxStartOfFrameOverruns: 96

I added a printf in tx_enqueue() in an attempt to see what’s going on, 
but doing so “fixed the bug” – obviously by adding a delay in the 
forwarding code. Maybe we have a timing/race between the driver and the 
cpsw hardware?

Also, I tested sending 14k pings from the standard-installed Linux in 
the BBB and that worked just fine. So the packets aren't lost between 
the hosts (the machines are connected via the same switch).

Any ideas?

Cheers -

/Olavi




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?25b417df-9073-0e3e-39f7-64ca241d516d>