From owner-freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 18 11:52:01 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 567771065672 for ; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 11:52:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fidaj@ukr.net) Received: from fsm1.ukr.net (fsm1.ukr.net [195.214.192.120]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CA8B8FC16 for ; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 11:52:00 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ukr.net; s=fsm; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Mime-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date; bh=mpLroLL/WhcdM5y73QPVQQ+WVL6ducen8LraFX/wtFg=; b=BMBKohsX1rqvhfOfYX1SDekUyzUUsFKHCmBsJ4deMtKcxtyc8OmAe1NuIBNdKaCD9pAyBUKrOnRzML+Ycn76kIJoaBQ+CsABqm/2haY9dOdatm7O2ml/SvRtsOq3FKFyXt8cNttDzR8b+2Ma8ieW2Em2GxGcnc9LWRdQglC39Yw=; Received: from [81.23.24.100] (helo=nonamehost.) by fsm1.ukr.net with esmtpsa ID 1RG7sV-000KWv-OL ; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 14:30:40 +0300 Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 14:30:12 +0300 From: Ivan Klymenko To: Urmas Lett Message-ID: <20111018143012.66cdbbf8@nonamehost.> In-Reply-To: <4E9D4124.9000307@eenet.ee> References: <4E9D4124.9000307@eenet.ee> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.9 (GTK+ 2.22.1; amd64-portbld-freebsd9.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ffmpeg & ULE X-BeenThere: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Performance/tuning List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 11:52:01 -0000 =D0=92 Tue, 18 Oct 2011 12:04:36 +0300 Urmas Lett =D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=88=D0=B5=D1=82: > Hello. >=20 > Why is ffmpeg -threads massively slower with ULE than 4BSD? >=20 > ffmpeg preset veryfast with sched_bsd: > real 1m49.407s > user 6m53.932s > sys 0m1.700s >=20 > ffmpeg preset veryfast with sched_ule: > real 2m52.711s > user 6m50.310s > sys 0m1.582s >=20 > #uname -a > FreeBSD 9.0-RC1 FreeBSD 9.0-RC1 #0: Mon Oct 17 20:32:29 EEST >=20 >=20 probably because you have a system processor with 2 cores...? if yes - then use the 4BSD...it is better for the two cores... IMHO