From owner-freebsd-emulation Fri Sep 25 09:08:36 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id JAA23767 for freebsd-emulation-outgoing; Fri, 25 Sep 1998 09:08:36 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from fallout.campusview.indiana.edu (fallout.campusview.indiana.edu [149.159.1.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id JAA23744 for ; Fri, 25 Sep 1998 09:08:25 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jfieber@fallout.campusview.indiana.edu) Received: from localhost (jfieber@localhost) by fallout.campusview.indiana.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with SMTP id LAA04593; Fri, 25 Sep 1998 11:08:13 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 1998 11:08:13 -0500 (EST) From: John Fieber To: Mike Smith cc: emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Running Sybase... In-Reply-To: <199809250653.XAA00781@word.smith.net.au> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Thu, 24 Sep 1998, Mike Smith wrote: > You're definitely using the standard kdump - getdomainname is syscall > 162, but under Linux that's nanosleep(), and what you're seeing there > looks about right for an idle applications. Ahh, things make much more sense now with linux_kdump! So now the question is which is easier: moving to 3.0 which has nanosleep() or moving nanosleep() to 2.2.7. Since the former will happen regardless, I'm thinking that will be the easier route...especially since I'm a novice at kernel hacking. -john To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message