From owner-freebsd-security Tue Apr 17 19:46:12 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from drugs.dv.isc.org (drugs.dv.isc.org [130.155.191.236]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB2C037B43F for ; Tue, 17 Apr 2001 19:46:07 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from marka@nominum.com) Received: from nominum.com (localhost.dv.isc.org [127.0.0.1]) by drugs.dv.isc.org (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f3I2jtT17721; Wed, 18 Apr 2001 12:45:57 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from marka@nominum.com) Message-Id: <200104180245.f3I2jtT17721@drugs.dv.isc.org> To: Michael Bryan Cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org From: Mark.Andrews@nominum.com Subject: Re: Latency of security notifications In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 17 Apr 2001 19:14:54 MST." <3ADCF89E.14CD5D37@ursine.com> Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2001 12:45:54 +1000 Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > The FreeBSD security team has been notified of a problem > with XYZ. An official security announcement will be forthcoming > shortly with the recommended fixes. In the meantime, please > subscribe to and read the freebsd-security mailing list for the > latest news on this issue. This approach doesn't work. I was not on the freebsd-security list when the ntpd bugtraq message went out. I found it impossible to see the *recent* traffic on the list that I had missed. This is not to say that it can't be made to work. Just that we are not at a stage were this is the correct response. Mark -- Mark Andrews, Nominum Inc. 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: Mark.Andrews@nominum.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message