Date: Tue, 4 May 2004 08:12:15 -0400 From: Michael Edenfield <kutulu@kutulu.org> To: David O'Brien <obrien@FreeBSD.org> Cc: "Rajamani, Rajarajan \(Rajarajan\)" <rrajarajan@lucent.com> Subject: Re: portupgrade failure for vim-6.2.521 Message-ID: <20040504121215.GA61746@wombat.localnet> In-Reply-To: <20040504030946.GA44550@dragon.nuxi.com> References: <1B8C2E08B21B8743A2B3AED07407DA76039F9AEF@nj7460exch002u.ho.lucent.com> <20040504030946.GA44550@dragon.nuxi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--r5Pyd7+fXNt84Ff3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable * David O'Brien <obrien@FreeBSD.org> [040503 23:10]: > On Mon, May 03, 2004 at 04:18:08PM -0400, Rajamani, Rajarajan (Rajarajan)= wrote: > > I have vim-6.2.383 and am using portupgrade to upgrade to=20 > > 6.2.251 and am getting the error given below. > > Is it due the space after prefix=3D ? > >=20 > > Did anyone else see a problem similar to this ? >=20 > *sigh* Would SOMEONE PLEASE TEST THIS PATCH AND GET BACK TO ME??? >=20 > This is the 5th time I've sent it out today and no responce from anyone > who has the skills to apply the patch and test. (it adds 502 to the > BADPATCHES list). I can't reproduce it locally. I'm starting to think > it is a 4.x-only problem. It's definitely not a 4.x-only problem, as I was able to reproduce it on -CURRENT and 5.2-RELEASE. I'm running with your patch right now. I'm highly confident that your patch will fix things, as patch 502 is definitely where the problem came in. --Mike --r5Pyd7+fXNt84Ff3 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFAl4ifCczNhKRsh48RAhqCAJ4moQu+l33zCAyobOO0aWonYXfJNwCfWKuJ NaILxZGr8ZhGe/BCJv5CtEs= =11Yn -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --r5Pyd7+fXNt84Ff3--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040504121215.GA61746>