From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue Jun 15 14:59: 1 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from apollo.backplane.com (apollo.backplane.com [209.157.86.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 239B9153EC; Tue, 15 Jun 1999 14:58:57 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dillon@apollo.backplane.com) Received: (from dillon@localhost) by apollo.backplane.com (8.9.3/8.9.1) id OAA21113; Tue, 15 Jun 1999 14:58:55 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dillon) Date: Tue, 15 Jun 1999 14:58:55 -0700 (PDT) From: Matthew Dillon Message-Id: <199906152158.OAA21113@apollo.backplane.com> To: "David E. Cross" Cc: Matthew Jacob , Guido van Rooij , freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, peter@FreeBSD.ORG, crossd@cs.rpi.edu Subject: Re: Holy cow - path component freeing a mess? (was Re: D'oh!) References: <199906152154.RAA39862@cs.rpi.edu> Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG :Way to go! I was hoping this would happen... it is the miracle of Open Source. :I am a bit sad that I'm not doing any of the stuff now though :(, you guys :are just too gosh darn quick. : :Seriously though... when are we likely to see this stuff hit -STABLE? I would :like to to dig through your nfs_serv.c at some point before it gets commited :too. There are a couple of other NFSv3 bugs that I have been tracking and I :would like to see if this addresses those. : :-- :David Cross | email: crossd@cs.rpi.edu The differences between -current and -stable for nfs_serv.c and nfs_subs.c are relatively minor. Once we've life tested the hell out of it in current, it should be easy to MFC into stable. Maybe 3 weeks total. -Matt Matthew Dillon To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message