From owner-freebsd-bugs  Wed Aug 12 02:23:55 1998
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id CAA27066
          for freebsd-bugs-outgoing; Wed, 12 Aug 1998 02:23:55 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from vader.cs.berkeley.edu (vader.CS.Berkeley.EDU [128.32.38.234])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id CAA27032;
          Wed, 12 Aug 1998 02:23:43 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from asami@vader.cs.berkeley.edu)
Received: from silvia.hip.berkeley.edu (sji-ca1-94.ix.netcom.com [209.109.232.94]) by vader.cs.berkeley.edu (8.8.7/8.7.3) with ESMTP id CAA25599; Wed, 12 Aug 1998 02:23:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.hip.berkeley.edu (8.8.8/8.6.9) id CAA08238; Wed, 12 Aug 1998 02:23:14 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 1998 02:23:14 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <199808120923.CAA08238@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu>
To: cracauer@cons.org
CC: cracauer@cons.org, freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG, andreas@FreeBSD.ORG
In-reply-to: <19980812110911.A12338@cons.org> (message from Martin Cracauer on Wed, 12 Aug 1998 11:09:11 +0200)
Subject: Re: pending/7574
From: asami@FreeBSD.ORG (Satoshi Asami)
Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

 * Ah, yes. And I always wondered why people claim GNATS isn't perfect
 * for relativly loosy coupled people :-)

:)

By the way, what do you (guys) think about adding the following to
send-pr?

===
Index: send-pr.sh
===================================================================
RCS file: /usr/cvs/src/gnu/usr.bin/send-pr/send-pr.sh,v
retrieving revision 1.6.2.1
diff -u -r1.6.2.1 send-pr.sh
--- send-pr.sh	1998/02/16 18:24:53	1.6.2.1
+++ send-pr.sh	1998/08/12 02:12:44
@@ -297,6 +297,11 @@
 SEND-PR: Please consult the send-pr man page `send-pr(1)' or the Texinfo
 SEND-PR: manual if you are not sure how to fill out a problem report.
 SEND-PR:
+SEND-PR: Do not CC: this mail to any other party.  If that person replies
+SEND-PR: to your direct mail, GNATS will not be able to recognize it as
+SEND-PR: a followup to your report and will open up another PR every time
+SEND-PR: there is a communication between you and the other party.
+SEND-PR:
 SEND-PR: Note that the Synopsis field is mandatory.  The Subject (for
 SEND-PR: the mail) will be made the same as Synopsis unless explicitly
 SEND-PR: changed.
===

I'm wondering if we should even put it right in the mail header, like

===
To: $GNATS_ADDR
SEND-PR: Do not CC: or BCC: this mail to others!
Subject: 
From: $FROM
Reply-To: $REPLY_TO
X-send-pr-version: $VERSION
===

Satoshi

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message