From owner-freebsd-ports Sat Apr 6 9:55:10 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from bast.unixathome.org (bast.unixathome.org [216.187.105.150]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31EBF37B404 for ; Sat, 6 Apr 2002 09:55:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from wocker (wocker.unixathome.org [192.168.0.99]) by bast.unixathome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E52AE3F28 for ; Sat, 6 Apr 2002 12:55:31 -0500 (EST) From: "Dan Langille" Organization: DVL Software Limited To: ports@freebsd.org Date: Sat, 6 Apr 2002 12:55:06 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: latest INDEX count versus cvs Reply-To: dan@langille.org X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Windows (v4.01) Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-description: Mail message body Message-Id: <20020406175531.E52AE3F28@bast.unixathome.org> Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On 5 Apr 2002 at 23:09, ports@freebsd.org wrote: > A new INDEX was just committed with 6777 ports. > > I've just finished a reconciliation between cvs, INDEX, and FreshPorts. > Here are my findings: > > The following ports are being pulled out of a cvsup, but are not appearing > in INDEX. Does anyone have a reason why they should not be added to their > respective catetgory Makefiles? With recent commits by ijliao (thank you), that leaves the following: > devel/arm-elf-gcc31 > japanese/alias-fonts > textproc/tclxml -- Dan Langille The FreeBSD Diary - http://freebsddiary.org/ - practical examples To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message