From owner-freebsd-current  Wed Mar 29 12:01:57 1995
Return-Path: current-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id MAA27628 for current-outgoing; Wed, 29 Mar 1995 12:01:57 -0800
Received: from trout.sri.MT.net (trout.sri.MT.net [204.182.243.12]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id MAA27622 for <current@FreeBSD.org>; Wed, 29 Mar 1995 12:01:53 -0800
Received: (from nate@localhost) by trout.sri.MT.net (8.6.9/8.6.9) id NAA00511; Wed, 29 Mar 1995 13:05:47 -0700
Date: Wed, 29 Mar 1995 13:05:47 -0700
From: Nate Williams <nate@trout.sri.MT.net>
Message-Id: <199503292005.NAA00511@trout.sri.MT.net>
In-Reply-To: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>
       "Re: Kernel compile 'feature' of new SNAP" (Mar 30,  5:47am)
X-Mailer: Mail User's Shell (7.2.5 10/14/92)
To: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>, current@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: Kernel compile 'feature' of new SNAP
Sender: current-owner@FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

[ Kernel compiles fail if the user doesn't have the /usr/src/include tree
  installed. ]

> Adding -I/usr/include to the end should be good enough.  It will only do
> the wrong thing for people who who have populated $S/../include but
> forgot.

Are you implying that they may have a /usr/src/include tree that's out
of sync with /usr/src/sys and which would screw up the kernel compile
because of the addition of -I/usr/include?


Nate

ps. I think the solution Bruce proposes is workable, and if no one
objects I'd like to see it committed.