From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 26 21:47:57 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F4FF16A41F for ; Tue, 26 Jun 2007 21:47:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bmah@freebsd.org) Received: from a.mail.sonic.net (a.mail.sonic.net [64.142.16.245]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8707C13C43E for ; Tue, 26 Jun 2007 21:47:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bmah@freebsd.org) Received: from bmah.local (hornet.kitchenlab.org [64.142.31.105]) (authenticated bits=0) by a.mail.sonic.net (8.13.8.Beta0-Sonic/8.13.7) with ESMTP id l5QLlucH028899 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 26 Jun 2007 14:47:57 -0700 Message-ID: <46818989.5060504@freebsd.org> Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2007 14:47:53 -0700 From: "Bruce A. Mah" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.4 (Macintosh/20070604) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mark Linimon References: <499c70c0706250322j3ac73760m38dbbb10bd816bb5@mail.gmail.com> <20070625112419.GB14669@soaustin.net> In-Reply-To: <20070625112419.GB14669@soaustin.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.1 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig9347123EA88C84ADE7984C8D" Cc: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org, Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri Subject: Re: Document old docs - http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/5-roadmap/index.html X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2007 21:47:57 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig9347123EA88C84ADE7984C8D Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable If memory serves me right, Mark Linimon wrote: >> Just wondering if FreeBSD still needs the roadmap pages for FeeBSD 5.x= >=20 > IMHO they're of "historical interest only". Yes the 5.X roadmap is for historical interest only at this point. I even wrote a few sentences to this effect in its abstract. :-) Cheers, Bruce. --------------enig9347123EA88C84ADE7984C8D Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGgYmJ2MoxcVugUsMRAiwFAJ49UjjimtMFjXQRleyikQk0kC3fWACgpp8q 2SmKHbbmHBEI8/aAQT0AcVQ= =2EY/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig9347123EA88C84ADE7984C8D--