From owner-freebsd-smp  Thu Nov  4  6:25:23 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-smp@freebsd.org
Received: from gw0.boostworks.com (gw0.boostworks.com [194.167.81.213])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CFC114C9A
	for <freebsd-smp@freebsd.org>; Thu,  4 Nov 1999 06:24:46 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from root@synx.com)
Received: from synx.com (root@rn.synx.com [192.1.1.241])
	by gw0.boostworks.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id PAA06321
	for <freebsd-smp@freebsd.org>; Thu, 4 Nov 1999 15:24:38 +0100 (CET)
Message-Id: <199911041424.PAA06321@gw0.boostworks.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Nov 1999 15:24:35 +0100 (CET)
From: Remy Nonnenmacher <remy@synx.com>
Reply-To: remy@synx.com
Subject: Piping under SMP
To: freebsd-smp@freebsd.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-smp@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org


I observed that piping commands quiet never make use of the full SMP
potential. This is probably due to the GL.

I would like to know (more for personnal knowledge than to get things
done) the difficulties to improve this specific area. Mainly, are we in
a all (full granular) of nothing (keep GL) situation ?

TIA.

RN.
IaM




To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-smp" in the body of the message