Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2004 08:11:13 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?S=F8ren_Schmidt?= <sos@DeepCore.dk> To: Matt Dawson <matt@mattsnetwork.co.uk> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/dev/ata ata-lowlevel.c Message-ID: <401F4991.4010503@DeepCore.dk> In-Reply-To: <200402030110.53973.matt@mattsnetwork.co.uk> References: <200402021549.i12Fn1Nu078057@repoman.freebsd.org> <1075754712.697.3.camel@kaiser.sig11.org> <200402030110.53973.matt@mattsnetwork.co.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Matt Dawson wrote: > Interestingly, I note that with verbose boot logging enabled, the point where > it fails when the ATA channel transfer mode is set also shows up my LiteOn as > being on a 40 conductor cable. It's not. It and the master drive, a Pioneer > DRV-104 are on an 80 conductor as recommended for all UDMA devices. The > Pioneer's entry on ata1-master shows correctly an 80 conductor cable. How can > this be possible? If both drives are on the same cable and one shows 80 and > the other shows 40 conductors, surely something is a bit screwy? Not sure if > this has any bearing, but I thought I'd point it out. The 80 conductor info is only valid for devices that can do more than UDMA2. -- -Søren
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?401F4991.4010503>