From owner-freebsd-current Sun Sep 27 22:17:04 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id WAA01689 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Sun, 27 Sep 1998 22:17:04 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from smtp1.xs4all.nl (smtp1.xs4all.nl [194.109.6.51]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id WAA01681 for ; Sun, 27 Sep 1998 22:17:00 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from plm@smtp1.xs4all.nl) Received: from localhost. (dc2-isdn38.dial.xs4all.nl [194.109.148.38]) by smtp1.xs4all.nl (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id HAA06415 for ; Mon, 28 Sep 1998 07:16:40 +0200 (CEST) Received: (from plm@localhost) by localhost. (8.9.1/8.8.8) id HAA25976; Mon, 28 Sep 1998 07:16:39 +0200 (MET DST) (envelope-from plm) To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Softupdates panics References: <87k92qksnj.fsf@totally-fudged-out-message-id> From: Peter Mutsaers Date: 27 Sep 1998 08:53:16 +0200 In-Reply-To: Ollivier Robert's message of "Sat, 26 Sep 1998 13:00:55 +0200" Message-ID: <87yar66o83.fsf@muon.xs4all.nl> X-Mailer: Gnus v5.6.44/Emacs 20.2 Lines: 18 Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG >> "OR" == Ollivier Robert writes: OR> According to Kevin Street: >> added `noatime' to two of my heavily used softupdates slices in OR> noatime with SU is a known Bad Thing[tm]. We should probably OR> refuse to use bth at the same time. noatime seems to be OR> unnecessary with SU anyway. Why a bad thing? I can see its use (especially when only reading a lot). Btw I've been using it for a while, without crashes until now. Is it really something one should not do? -- /\_/\ ( o.o ) Peter Mutsaers | Abcoude (Utrecht), | Trust me, I know ) ^ ( plm@xs4all.nl | the Netherlands | what I'm doing. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message