From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Aug 29 17:29:18 2011
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C0831065675
	for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Mon, 29 Aug 2011 17:29:18 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from ivoras@gmail.com)
Received: from mail-gw0-f54.google.com (mail-gw0-f54.google.com [74.125.83.54])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B682E8FC1D
	for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Mon, 29 Aug 2011 17:29:17 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by gwb15 with SMTP id 15so5986443gwb.13
	for <multiple recipients>; Mon, 29 Aug 2011 10:29:17 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
	h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date
	:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type;
	bh=ZKBCFO2AmyCKb7en/gN8hYYQAkRML5KPC2FwoSSXuD0=;
	b=AvnFDuEc0Ns4EmOwclgcCC659ETxM51V44TTfsyoNqpX+BDagfc2UlSelt8E9pWTOm
	Gq93IoS+vw2HuujtCmxN1vlRiNLKUGH/VnHhQ+KQchk7B+jBvb2l0PZpq0jz5qkZEnnb
	h4MlVuJrhdewRnAsw9MP0sxcGwxyAWtWtZNtw=
Received: by 10.100.35.1 with SMTP id i1mr4178091ani.139.1314638957124; Mon,
	29 Aug 2011 10:29:17 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: ivoras@gmail.com
Received: by 10.100.47.11 with HTTP; Mon, 29 Aug 2011 10:28:37 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAMBSHm_Sv_KZUs4h-tDGAZCq8s2qo_bMmfZxLbVkcH1=_Wu0OQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <j38lj5$s9a$1@dough.gmane.org>
	<CAGH67wRxehY4fZPOd1hqXkBffOrSvh4ujYw6XeqVj_VsWdDsaQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<j3g8o3$2fq$1@dough.gmane.org>
	<CAMBSHm_Sv_KZUs4h-tDGAZCq8s2qo_bMmfZxLbVkcH1=_Wu0OQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org>
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2011 19:28:37 +0200
X-Google-Sender-Auth: WLCR3fVsBUhXIhlCLr48cfXoC0M
Message-ID: <CAF-QHFW=aU3=iKE9WMg6+D6eP9OXth=c0AidBc140ykmAPD2zg@mail.gmail.com>
To: mdf@freebsd.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Large machine test ideas
X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD
	<freebsd-hackers.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>,
	<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2011 17:29:18 -0000

On 29 August 2011 18:33,  <mdf@freebsd.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 7:46 AM, Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org> wrote:
>> On 26/08/2011 19:44, Garrett Cooper wrote:
>>> On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 10:36 AM, Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> ...
>>>
>>>> I think that I'll need a 9-CURRENT snapshot on it to run all 128 CPUs,
>>>> right?
>>>
>>> A 9.0-BETA1 snapshot, yes.
>>
>> Well, I'll leave it another half an hour but the 9.9-beta1 shapshot
>> froze on boot after showing a "SRAT: No CPU found for memory domain 4".
>
> This message implies the memory affinity information coming from ACPI
> is either non-sensical, or you have an unexpected physical setup where
> there really are CPUs with no memory in the local sockets.
>
> You should be able to boot with something like hint.srat.0="disabled"
> at the boot loader prompt.

Unfortunately, neither the memtest or the srat disabling tunables
worked (I also tried disabling srat.4).

My time with the machine is over, so I can't do more testing.