Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2012 16:34:07 +0200 From: Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org> To: Nikolay Denev <ndenev@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: NFS server bottlenecks Message-ID: <CAF-QHFUU0hhtRNK1_p9zks2w%2Be22bfWOtv%2BXaqgFqTiURcJBbQ@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <0857D79A-6276-433F-9603-D52125CF190F@gmail.com> References: <937460294.2185822.1350093954059.JavaMail.root@erie.cs.uoguelph.ca> <302BF685-4B9D-49C8-8000-8D0F6540C8F7@gmail.com> <k5gtdh$nc0$1@ger.gmane.org> <0857D79A-6276-433F-9603-D52125CF190F@gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 15 October 2012 16:31, Nikolay Denev <ndenev@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Oct 15, 2012, at 2:52 PM, Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org> wrote: >> http://people.freebsd.org/~ivoras/diffs/nfscache_lock.patch >> >> It should apply to HEAD without Rick's patches. >> >> It's a bit different approach than Rick's, breaking down locks even more. > > Applied and compiled OK, I will be able to test it tomorrow. Ok, thanks! The differences should be most visible in edge cases with a larger number of nfsd processes (16+) and many CPU cores.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAF-QHFUU0hhtRNK1_p9zks2w%2Be22bfWOtv%2BXaqgFqTiURcJBbQ>