From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 28 15:00:13 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFB2D37B401 for ; Wed, 28 May 2003 15:00:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from plmler2.mail.eds.com (plmler2.mail.eds.com [199.228.142.72]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 207AC43F3F for ; Wed, 28 May 2003 15:00:13 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from paul.talbot@eds.com) Received: from plmlir1.mail.eds.com (plmlir1-2.mail.eds.com [199.228.142.131]) by plmler2.mail.eds.com (8.11.6p2/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h4SM0BM32000; Wed, 28 May 2003 17:00:11 -0500 Received: from plmlir1.mail.eds.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by plmlir1.mail.eds.com (8.11.6p2/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h4SM09u23887; Wed, 28 May 2003 17:00:10 -0500 (CDT) Received: from USPLM001.examhub.exch.eds.com (uspla005.txpln.us.eds.com [148.94.64.102]) by plmlir1.mail.eds.com (8.11.6p2/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h4SM09n23875; Wed, 28 May 2003 17:00:09 -0500 (CDT) Received: by uspla005.txpln.us.eds.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2656.59) id ; Wed, 28 May 2003 17:00:12 -0500 Message-ID: From: "Talbot, Paul" To: "'Garance A Drosihn'" Date: Wed, 28 May 2003 17:00:04 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2656.59) Content-Type: text/plain cc: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Subject: RE: portversion/portupgrade X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 May 2003 22:00:14 -0000 My x86 box doesn't exhibit the problem. -Paul -----Original Message----- From: Garance A Drosihn [mailto:drosih@rpi.edu] Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 2:55 PM To: Kris Kennaway; Talbot, Paul Cc: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: portversion/portupgrade At 2:47 PM -0700 5/28/03, Kris Kennaway wrote: >On Wed, May 28, 2003, Talbot, Paul wrote: > > >> Hello all... >> > > I have an issue with portversion and portupgrade (20030427) on > > my Ultra 10.... > > > After running the 'portsdb -Uu' command, I get the following > > output from portversion and portupgrade: > > >> localhost# portversion >> ** No package matching '*' was found. >> localhost# >> >> localhost# portupgrade -a >> ** No such package '*' is installed. >> localhost# > >Yes, this is known to be broken. knu is aware of it, but seems to be >too busy to fix it. If there are any other ruby hackers out there who >are familiar with the ruby internals, fixing this would be a great >help. Do you know if this a bug in ruby itself, or is it only in portversion && portupgrade? Is it only happening on sparc64? -- Garance Alistair Drosehn = gad@gilead.netel.rpi.edu Senior Systems Programmer or gad@freebsd.org Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute or drosih@rpi.edu