From owner-cvs-all  Fri Oct 25 11: 9:23 2002
Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 0A34637B404; Fri, 25 Oct 2002 11:09:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailman.zeta.org.au (mailman.zeta.org.au [203.26.10.16])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 70C2843E3B; Fri, 25 Oct 2002 11:09:20 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from bde@zeta.org.au)
Received: from bde.zeta.org.au (bde.zeta.org.au [203.2.228.102])
	by mailman.zeta.org.au (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id EAA01414;
	Sat, 26 Oct 2002 04:09:18 +1000
Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2002 04:20:28 +1000 (EST)
From: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>
X-X-Sender: bde@gamplex.bde.org
To: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.org>
Cc: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.org>,
	<cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org>, <cvs-all@FreeBSD.org>
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/as/alpha-freebsd config.h
 src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/as/i386-freebsd config.h src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/as/ia64-freebsd
 config.h src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/as/power
In-Reply-To: <20021025071800.GA1252@sunbay.com>
Message-ID: <20021026041633.K4938-100000@gamplex.bde.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <cvs-all.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=subscribe%20cvs-all>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=unsubscribe%20cvs-all>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

On Fri, 25 Oct 2002, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:

> On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 07:35:22PM -0700, David O'Brien wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 12:10:19PM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> > > "now" should be expanded to __FreeBSD_version checks in
> > > bootstrap-, build-, and cross-tools, and you know this.
> > > I am pretty sure that part of the above changes broke
> > > source upgrades from not-so-old -CURRENT and of course
> > > all of RELENG_4's
> >
> > I will MFC stpcpy(3).  You know I don't care one iota about upgrades from
> > non top of RELENG_4 tree for 4.x->CURRENT upgrades.
> >
> So you similarly don't care any iota about upgrades from not so
> old 5.0-CURRENT without stpcpy(3) for CURRENT->CURRENT upgrades.

MFC of stpcpy() just shoots one messenger IMO.

Bruce


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message