From owner-freebsd-bugs Sat Jul 5 16:52:51 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id QAA25880 for bugs-outgoing; Sat, 5 Jul 1997 16:52:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hwcn.org (main.hwcn.org [199.212.94.65]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id QAA25874; Sat, 5 Jul 1997 16:52:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from james.freenet.hamilton.on.ca (ac199@james.hwcn.org [199.212.94.66]) by hwcn.org (8.8.6/8.8.6) with ESMTP id TAA13158; Sat, 5 Jul 1997 19:53:08 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (ac199@localhost) by james.freenet.hamilton.on.ca (8.8.6/8.8.6) with SMTP id TAA06999; Sat, 5 Jul 1997 19:53:20 -0400 (EDT) X-Authentication-Warning: james.freenet.hamilton.on.ca: ac199 owned process doing -bs Date: Sat, 5 Jul 1997 19:53:20 -0400 (EDT) From: Tim Vanderhoek X-Sender: ac199@james.freenet.hamilton.on.ca Reply-To: hoek@hwcn.org To: Bill Fenner cc: fenner@hub.freebsd.org, freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Subject: Re: bin/3437 In-Reply-To: <199707051802.LAA13152@hub.freebsd.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Sat, 5 Jul 1997, Bill Fenner wrote: > Synopsis: SU acting strange on 2.2.1 Release > > State-Changed-From-To: open-closed > State-Changed-By: fenner > State-Changed-When: Sat Jul 5 11:02:46 PDT 1997 > State-Changed-Why: > Duplicate for bin/3424 You're being careless. If this is an attempt to close misc/4028, you should have at least closed the correct duplicate (ie. bin/3424, not bin/3437). Because you closed the wrong duplicate, that makes it harder to find the audit-trail for the real one. In this case, the audit-trail would have shown that both can be closed... See http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/search.cgi?words=su+acting+strange&max=250&source=freebsd-bugs&docnum=1 as reference for the example which proves my point. Unless some of the "bug-closed" messages are late reaching me, it also looks like you aren't intending to close all of the prs which should be closed, so I can't help but suspect that it probably wouldn't hurt to mention which ones you closed in a follow-up to misc/4028. -- Outnumbered? Maybe. Outspoken? Never! tIM...HOEk [Ok, I'm probably not being very kind... :) What I mean to say is that some of the prs you closed are mentioned in misc/4028, "gnats silently re-opened 14 prs", and should be dealt with as a group, not individually]