Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 4 Dec 2012 21:13:54 +0000 (UTC)
From:      Walter Hurry <walterhurry@gmail.com>
To:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: pkg upgrade?
Message-ID:  <k9lp2h$9t6$1@ger.gmane.org>
References:  <k9gigp$uqo$1@ger.gmane.org> <50BC4790.5010707@FreeBSD.org> <k9igqr$1ll$1@ger.gmane.org> <50BCCA1C.7010800@freebsd.org> <50BD10EF.3000601@infracaninophile.co.uk> <k9j802$nj8$1@ger.gmane.org> <50BDA374.5090305@infracaninophile.co.uk> <50BE5CA3.3050308@infracaninophile.co.uk> <k9ln84$oc5$1@ger.gmane.org> <50BE61A4.9010503@infracaninophile.co.uk> <50BE66D1.6030409@infracaninophile.co.uk>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 04 Dec 2012 21:10:41 +0000, Matthew Seaman wrote:

> On 04/12/2012 20:48, Matthew Seaman wrote:
>> On 04/12/2012 20:42, Walter Hurry wrote:
>>> On Tue, 04 Dec 2012 20:27:15 +0000, Matthew Seaman wrote:
>>>
>>>> I just committed a fix to the release-1.0 branch which will be in the
>>>> next release.  Was already fixed in master.
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>>
>>> Does that fix 'pkg info' reporting zero size, or the 'pkg update'
>>> misreporting of size difference, or both?
>> 
>> Oh, yes.  That was to fix pkg info getting the installed size of
>> packages wrong when reading a pkg tarball.
>> 
>> The other issue with pkg update had temporarily escaped me.
> 
> Yeah.  Committed a fix for the pkg upgrade disk space thing too.  If you
> upgraded to a package that was smaller than the one it was replacing it
> would report the change in space used as the sum of the old and new
> sizes, when clearly it should be the difference.  D'Oh!  Surprised no
> one spotted that before now.

Excellent. Thanks again.




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?k9lp2h$9t6$1>