Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2012 21:13:54 +0000 (UTC) From: Walter Hurry <walterhurry@gmail.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pkg upgrade? Message-ID: <k9lp2h$9t6$1@ger.gmane.org> References: <k9gigp$uqo$1@ger.gmane.org> <50BC4790.5010707@FreeBSD.org> <k9igqr$1ll$1@ger.gmane.org> <50BCCA1C.7010800@freebsd.org> <50BD10EF.3000601@infracaninophile.co.uk> <k9j802$nj8$1@ger.gmane.org> <50BDA374.5090305@infracaninophile.co.uk> <50BE5CA3.3050308@infracaninophile.co.uk> <k9ln84$oc5$1@ger.gmane.org> <50BE61A4.9010503@infracaninophile.co.uk> <50BE66D1.6030409@infracaninophile.co.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 04 Dec 2012 21:10:41 +0000, Matthew Seaman wrote: > On 04/12/2012 20:48, Matthew Seaman wrote: >> On 04/12/2012 20:42, Walter Hurry wrote: >>> On Tue, 04 Dec 2012 20:27:15 +0000, Matthew Seaman wrote: >>> >>>> I just committed a fix to the release-1.0 branch which will be in the >>>> next release. Was already fixed in master. >>> >>> Thanks! >>> >>> Does that fix 'pkg info' reporting zero size, or the 'pkg update' >>> misreporting of size difference, or both? >> >> Oh, yes. That was to fix pkg info getting the installed size of >> packages wrong when reading a pkg tarball. >> >> The other issue with pkg update had temporarily escaped me. > > Yeah. Committed a fix for the pkg upgrade disk space thing too. If you > upgraded to a package that was smaller than the one it was replacing it > would report the change in space used as the sum of the old and new > sizes, when clearly it should be the difference. D'Oh! Surprised no > one spotted that before now. Excellent. Thanks again.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?k9lp2h$9t6$1>