Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 19 Sep 2024 13:14:50 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        net@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 280648] Traffic leak between fibs
Message-ID:  <bug-280648-7501-g9idCZy9pC@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-280648-7501@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References:  <bug-280648-7501@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D280648

Marek Zarychta <zarychtam@plan-b.pwste.edu.pl> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |zarychtam@plan-b.pwste.edu.
                   |                            |pl

--- Comment #16 from Marek Zarychta <zarychtam@plan-b.pwste.edu.pl> ---
(In reply to Egor from comment #15)
>I set fib 1 for all frr processes in rc.conf.d Thats why i expected that i=
t took only
>fib 1 routes from the kernel but it didn't.

When FRR runs under FIB 1 it means that all the connections with peers will=
 be
done from that FIB. Nothing more. If you want to import routes from
non-standard fib (FIB =E2=89=A0 0) then use option "ip import table" instea=
d, which
should also work when you will run FRR under default FIB.
I don't know if our FRR port supports multiple routing tables correctly, but
definitely net/bird2 copes fine with them.

That's probably not a bug though, but I have not investigated this PR
extensively.

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-280648-7501-g9idCZy9pC>