Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2024 13:14:50 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 280648] Traffic leak between fibs Message-ID: <bug-280648-7501-g9idCZy9pC@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-280648-7501@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-280648-7501@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D280648 Marek Zarychta <zarychtam@plan-b.pwste.edu.pl> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |zarychtam@plan-b.pwste.edu. | |pl --- Comment #16 from Marek Zarychta <zarychtam@plan-b.pwste.edu.pl> --- (In reply to Egor from comment #15) >I set fib 1 for all frr processes in rc.conf.d Thats why i expected that i= t took only >fib 1 routes from the kernel but it didn't. When FRR runs under FIB 1 it means that all the connections with peers will= be done from that FIB. Nothing more. If you want to import routes from non-standard fib (FIB =E2=89=A0 0) then use option "ip import table" instea= d, which should also work when you will run FRR under default FIB. I don't know if our FRR port supports multiple routing tables correctly, but definitely net/bird2 copes fine with them. That's probably not a bug though, but I have not investigated this PR extensively. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-280648-7501-g9idCZy9pC>