From owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Sep 18 21:16:42 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-java@hub.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BBEA106566B;
	Tue, 18 Sep 2012 21:16:42 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from jkim@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org
	[IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FE1E8FC12;
	Tue, 18 Sep 2012 21:16:42 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q8ILGgTM083801;
	Tue, 18 Sep 2012 21:16:42 GMT
	(envelope-from jkim@freefall.freebsd.org)
Received: (from jkim@localhost)
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q8ILGfkS083797;
	Tue, 18 Sep 2012 21:16:41 GMT (envelope-from jkim)
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2012 21:16:41 GMT
Message-Id: <201209182116.q8ILGfkS083797@freefall.freebsd.org>
To: rfarmer@predatorlabs.net, jkim@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-java@FreeBSD.org
From: jkim@FreeBSD.org
Cc: 
Subject: Re: ports/151042: [patch] java/openjdk6 Respect CC
X-BeenThere: freebsd-java@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting Java to FreeBSD <freebsd-java.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-java>,
	<mailto:freebsd-java-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-java>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-java@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-java-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-java>,
	<mailto:freebsd-java-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2012 21:16:42 -0000

Synopsis: [patch] java/openjdk6 Respect CC

State-Changed-From-To: open->closed
State-Changed-By: jkim
State-Changed-When: Tue Sep 18 21:10:43 UTC 2012
State-Changed-Why: 
Committed, thanks!

Please note one of the main goals of FreeBSD Java project is to keep local
changes as minimal as possible, so that it can be committed upstream.
Therefore, the Anonymous patch was rejected because we should not assume it
is built from ports infrastructure.

http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=151042