From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Aug 17 13:19:23 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57968DE1A32 for ; Thu, 17 Aug 2017 13:19:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from herbert@mailbox.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3963D7182B for ; Thu, 17 Aug 2017 13:19:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from herbert@mailbox.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 35A8EDE1A31; Thu, 17 Aug 2017 13:19:23 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3541ADE1A30 for ; Thu, 17 Aug 2017 13:19:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from herbert@mailbox.org) Received: from mx2.mailbox.org (mx2.mailbox.org [80.241.60.215]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.mailbox.org", Issuer "SwissSign Server Silver CA 2014 - G22" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E5E1B7182A for ; Thu, 17 Aug 2017 13:19:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from herbert@mailbox.org) Received: from smtp1.mailbox.org (smtp1.mailbox.org [80.241.60.240]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx2.mailbox.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8092B49458 for ; Thu, 17 Aug 2017 15:19:14 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=mailbox.org; h= content-type:content-type:mime-version:references:message-id :in-reply-to:subject:subject:from:from:date:date:received; s= mail20150812; t=1502975953; bh=ssV2r5xd1w9XJLZDCuvVbF1T777SYynlq dN4K7imZrA=; b=oosyh+oWRYCGg1gloxVyjYlz9hUNy4+RT4NZr5mxI6UWaGUFB S82i9oxbEsYmKMrUhqeLn6AC+ezfWleERrDNAtTOjXzsSKq5TH4IU/gBqsJ6z3NC L02cfSCP5tI1A2I63UaVuSu7D8jQRmp33c7Vv7EE2YcHK9Ax7qCNe1eOFssaOLNS 7s+ayU8AndYfrZw/y8T0bHfrYqvdWhhpScrZsT2d1J+ZL1QQrB5zvjRCYNoY5tuh OgigOb3lpbgSQ+NVippZSJtcAJnJOjNvwTO3NBN2/nst8fHXSII2Krs1bdW1Z7Vc o3yavTaOEIi5oaVu0dHg6jIkYtnjxtRpv7T3Q== X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at heinlein-support.de Received: from smtp1.mailbox.org ([80.241.60.240]) by spamfilter03.heinlein-hosting.de (spamfilter03.heinlein-hosting.de [80.241.56.117]) (amavisd-new, port 10030) with ESMTP id LJhHBQs8t429 for ; Thu, 17 Aug 2017 15:19:13 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2017 15:19:11 +0200 (CEST) From: "Herbert J. Skuhra" To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: gtkmm30 fails to build under 10.3 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <9la9pch88dj02bs7ts4r1cfa7lgvnssh28__31177.0872948275$1502915924$gmane$org@4ax.com> <378r-8cln-wny@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2017 13:19:23 -0000 On Thu, 17 Aug 2017, scratch65535@att.net wrote: > [Default] On Thu, 17 Aug 2017 07:12:36 -0400, I wrote: > >> [Default] On Thu, 17 Aug 2017 10:45:58 +0200, Jan Beich >> wrote: >> >>> writes: >>> >>>> [Default] On Wed, 16 Aug 2017 22:46:44 +0200, Jan Beich >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> writes: >>>>> >>>>>> Package dependency requirement 'giomm-2.4 >= 2.49.1' could not be >>>>>> satisfied. >>> >>> $ pkg which -o /usr/local/libdata/pkgconfig/giomm-2.4.pc >>> /usr/local/libdata/pkgconfig/giomm-2.4.pc was installed by package devel/glibmm >> >> We might be talking at crossed purposes, here. The makefile did >> indeed install 2.4, but that's not 2.49.1 (note that it's "2.49" >> not "2.4.9"). 2.49 is not visible in my >> freshly-updated-just-before-these-build-attempts ports tree. . >> >> The version number seems goofed up. Why would it ever imagine >> that 2.4 is 2.49? There doesn't seem to be a rule that version >> numbers are truncated to 1 digit after the decimal point. > > Okay, I'd not noticed til now that there does seem to be a > truncate convention, which seems counterproductive t'me. So what > looks like v2.4 could be v2.4 or v2.49 or even, theoretically, > v2.49999. Not much information in a single digit. Have you checked the Makefile of devel/glibmm? The version actually is 2.50.1 so it should match 'giomm-2.4 >= 2.49.1'. You obviously have an old version installed. 'pkg version -n glibmm'? > But in any event it's not 2.49, and the "2.4" I installed is the > only "2.4" in the ports tree. Reinstalling won't help. Just try what jbeich@ told you. Or use pkg! -- Herbert