Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2007 14:36:12 +0200 From: Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org> To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: kthreads, kprocs? Message-ID: <fffh3t$2ac$1@ger.gmane.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigE0F4F085979DCBB40E6B0848 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, I've seen the cvs notice about kthread renaming to kprocs, and I wonder why - what's the need for "proper" kthreads and how will it be different from current implementation of kprocs? Will it mimic userland to form a "hierarchy": processes have threads? Why, since all the kernel is a single context wrt memory protection? --------------enigE0F4F085979DCBB40E6B0848 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFHG0e8ldnAQVacBcgRAtw6AKD0v+dAFC/njlkshzo4MZLWtDhcwACgzrpj kVcY2kiy3VUoaYgJvPJ1F3Q= =bVV5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigE0F4F085979DCBB40E6B0848--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?fffh3t$2ac$1>