From owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 19 15:55:26 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4122516A4CE for ; Wed, 19 Jan 2005 15:55:26 +0000 (GMT) Received: from phantom.cris.net (phantom.cris.net [212.110.130.74]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 237D743D5E for ; Wed, 19 Jan 2005 15:55:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from phantom@FreeBSD.org.ua) Received: from phantom.cris.net (phantom@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by phantom.cris.net (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j0JFwfqk076655; Wed, 19 Jan 2005 17:58:41 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from phantom@FreeBSD.org.ua) Received: (from phantom@localhost) by phantom.cris.net (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id j0JFwatc076654; Wed, 19 Jan 2005 17:58:36 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from phantom) Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2005 17:58:36 +0200 From: Alexey Zelkin To: Ian G Message-ID: <20050119155836.GA76616@phantom.cris.net> References: <20050119142601.GA75697@phantom.cris.net> <41EE743A.5030501@iang.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <41EE743A.5030501@iang.org> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.9-STABLE i386 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1i cc: java@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [RFC] ia64/sparc64 jdk 1.5.0 ports? X-BeenThere: freebsd-java@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting Java to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2005 15:55:26 -0000 hi, On Wed, Jan 19, 2005 at 02:52:42PM +0000, Ian G wrote: > Alexey Zelkin wrote: > > >Gentelmen, > > > >I'd like to listen about people opinion -- DO WE NEED ia64 and/or sparc64 > >PORT OF JDK15 ? Please take it as little survey, and post your thoughts > >privately or to mailing list. > > > > > > Do you mean the Intel 64 bit architecture that > bombed? If so, I vote NO. My guess is that > sometime around mid 2004, Intel canned that > future in private and is migrating it out over time. > > Same vote for Sparc64. Not for my money. Thank you for your opinion > ( If you mean the AMD Opteron architecture, then > definately YES. ) It's already in-tree, working and will be part of patchset1 release. -- /* Alexey Zelkin && Independent Contractor */ /* phantom(at)FreeBSD.org && http://www.FreeBSD.org/java */ /* phantom(at)cris.net && http://www.FreeBSD.org.ua/ */