From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Apr 3 14:53:26 1995 Return-Path: hackers-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id OAA20334 for hackers-outgoing; Mon, 3 Apr 1995 14:53:26 -0700 Received: from vector.eikon.e-technik.tu-muenchen.de (vector.eikon.e-technik.tu-muenchen.de [129.187.142.36]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id OAA20204; Mon, 3 Apr 1995 14:50:40 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by vector.eikon.e-technik.tu-muenchen.de (8.6.11/8.6.9) with SMTP id TAA15269; Sun, 2 Apr 1995 19:41:49 +0200 Message-Id: <199504021741.TAA15269@vector.eikon.e-technik.tu-muenchen.de> X-Authentication-Warning: vector.eikon.e-technik.tu-muenchen.de: Host localhost didn't use HELO protocol To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" cc: Joe Greco , hackers@freefall.cdrom.com Subject: Re: httpd as part of the system. In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 25 Mar 1995 01:13:54 +0100." <25507.796090434@freefall.cdrom.com> Date: Sun, 02 Apr 1995 19:41:48 +0200 From: Julian Howard Stacey Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk When considering whether net ports should be tossed into src/ , don't forget to consider the maintenance issues, ports/ seems to be pretty well constructed to absorb new releases, Re-bmaking everything for each new release of a currently-in-ports utility might get to be quite a headache, & might even be sufficiently off putting, that it doesnt in future get done as often as it might if stayed in ports ? Julian S