From owner-freebsd-hackers  Mon Oct  7 15:34:22 1996
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id PAA05014
          for hackers-outgoing; Mon, 7 Oct 1996 15:34:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from root.com (implode.root.com [198.145.90.17])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id PAA05009
          for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Mon, 7 Oct 1996 15:34:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by root.com (8.7.5/8.6.5) with SMTP id PAA21080; Mon, 7 Oct 1996 15:34:34 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <199610072234.PAA21080@root.com>
X-Authentication-Warning: implode.root.com: Host localhost [127.0.0.1] didn't use HELO protocol
To: Luigi Rizzo <luigi@labinfo.iet.unipi.it>
cc: wollman@freefall.freebsd.org, hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/netinet ip_input.c ip_output.c raw_ip.c 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 07 Oct 1996 22:24:28 BST."
             <199610072124.WAA29038@labinfo.iet.unipi.it> 
From: David Greenman <dg@root.com>
Reply-To: dg@root.com
Date: Mon, 07 Oct 1996 15:34:34 -0700
Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

>Before I embark in such a cleanup and submit something, do others
>think that a cleanup is useful, or it is preferable to leave it alone
>in order to keep it close to the documentation ?

   I see no reason to make gratuitous changes right now, but I don't see any
reason why the TUBA stuff shouldn't be yanked out. Garrett has more of a stake
in this than most, so perhaps it should be his call.

-DG

David Greenman
Core-team/Principal Architect, The FreeBSD Project