From owner-freebsd-net Mon Mar 25 14:42:13 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from rwcrmhc51.attbi.com (rwcrmhc51.attbi.com [204.127.198.38]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAF7737B9FC for ; Mon, 25 Mar 2002 14:40:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from InterJet.elischer.org ([12.232.206.8]) by rwcrmhc51.attbi.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.27 201-229-121-127-20010626) with ESMTP id <20020325224012.SZWN2626.rwcrmhc51.attbi.com@InterJet.elischer.org>; Mon, 25 Mar 2002 22:40:12 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.elischer.org [127.0.0.1]) by InterJet.elischer.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id OAA38320; Mon, 25 Mar 2002 14:34:20 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2002 14:34:19 -0800 (PST) From: Julian Elischer To: Matthew Luckie Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ip_output and ENOBUFS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Mon, 25 Mar 2002, Matthew Luckie wrote: > Hi > > > Is there a mechanism to tell when ip_output should be called again? > Ideally, I would block until such time as i could send it via ip_output no, there is no such mechanism that I know of.. > > (please CC: me on any responses) > > Matthew Luckie > mjl@nlanr.net > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message