From owner-freebsd-arch Fri Mar 30 13:41:48 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from babel.spoiled.org (babel.spoiled.org [212.84.234.227]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 18C7337B71A for ; Fri, 30 Mar 2001 13:41:45 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from list-freebsd.arch@spoiled.org) Received: (qmail 9505 invoked by uid 8); 30 Mar 2001 21:41:37 -0000 From: thomas graichen Reply-To: thomas graichen X-Newsgroups: spoiled.freebsd.arch Subject: Re: Background Fsck Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2001 23:20:03 +0200 Organization: spoiled dot org Lines: 23 Distribution: local Message-ID: References: <200103290522.VAA06966@beastie.mckusick.com> <200103300053.TAA27553@thunderer.cnchost.com> <20010329220128.B21838@peorth.iteration.net> <20010329201156.P9431@fw.wintelcom.net> Reply-To: thomas graichen X-Complaints-To: newsmaster@spoiled.org User-Agent: tin/1.4.4-20000803 ("Vet for the Insane") (UNIX) (Linux/2.4.2-XFS (i586)) To: arch@FreeBSD.org Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Alfred Perlstein wrote: > As far as speeding up fsck in general, I haven't heard anything, > suggestions are welcome. :) it might be worth to talk to ted tso about this - i vaguely remember him talking about some small optimisations and fixes he has found while writing the ext2 fsck ... i am not shure if all of those ideas made it back to the bsd fsck ... at least worth a check i think hope that helps t p.s.: ted tso is the e2fs utils maintainer for linux - should be easy to find it's email adress (i'm offline right now so i can't) - i think he is at valinux now ... -- thomas graichen ... perfection is reached, not when there is no longer anything to add, but when there is no longer anything to take away. --- antoine de saint-exupery To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message