Date: Sun, 03 May 2015 18:48:13 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 199874] sysutils/fusefs-exfat: add support for CREATE operations Message-ID: <bug-199874-13-1S1G5nloMn@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-199874-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-199874-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199874 --- Comment #5 from danny@dannywarren.com --- Thanks, and agreed! >From looking at the changelogs, it looks like the feature you are referring to was introduced in fusefs back in 2005. So it probably isn't a recent upstream change causing this, but instead something with the kernel fuse module introduced in FreeBSD 10.x. I stumbled on a resolved PR (bug #192563) for sysutils/fusefs-encfs that deals with the same issue, and has a very similar patch to the one I submitted (that would have saved me some time!). There is another PR (bug #187485) against sysutils/fusefs-wdfs with a similar patch, but that port was dropped so it was never applied. So we know that this applies to all fusefs modules running under 10.x, and that other modules have hacked in a create -> mknod+open wrapper to get things working (just to confirm that it is a sane workaround). Agreed about figuring out where the real issue is coming from, I will do more research as I can't find the source of the problem in the kernel source at a glance. I should probably file a bug against the fuse kernel module. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-199874-13-1S1G5nloMn>