Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 31 Jan 2017 05:17:11 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 216668] [PATCH] expand EXTRA_PATCH_TREE functionality to Makefile.local
Message-ID:  <bug-216668-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D216668

            Bug ID: 216668
           Summary: [PATCH] expand EXTRA_PATCH_TREE functionality to
                    Makefile.local
           Product: Ports & Packages
           Version: Latest
          Hardware: Any
                OS: Any
            Status: New
          Keywords: patch
          Severity: Affects Some People
          Priority: ---
         Component: Ports Framework
          Assignee: portmgr@FreeBSD.org
          Reporter: mail@fbsd.e4m.org
                CC: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
          Keywords: patch

Created attachment 179465
  --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D179465&action=
=3Dedit
Additionally seatch in EXTRA_PATCH_TREE for Makefile.local

https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports?view=3Drevision&revision=3D431681
added the EXTRA_PATCH_TREE feature. I would like to suggest to deal with
Makefile.local the same way (additionally searching them in the
EXTRA_PATCH_TREE).
This way Makefile.local could stay out of the regular ports tree as well.

The patch attached is a suggestion for this. There are no changes for people
not
using Makefile.local in EXTRA_PATCH_TREE.

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-216668-13>