Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 04:47:34 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Oliver Eikemeier <eikemeier@fillmore-labs.com> Cc: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Subject: Re: incremental ports/INDEX builder Message-ID: <20040622114734.GA14959@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <40D7FD85.2070201@fillmore-labs.com> References: <20040622083214.GA91013@sanatana.dharma> <20040622100327.GA12999@xor.obsecurity.org> <40D7F5EF.4090406@fillmore-labs.com> <20040622112326.GA14566@xor.obsecurity.org> <40D7FD85.2070201@fillmore-labs.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--LZvS9be/3tNcYl/X Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Jun 22, 2004 at 11:36:05AM +0200, Oliver Eikemeier wrote: > Kris Kennaway wrote: >=20 > >At least for my purposes, I need index builds to be 100% accurate 100% > >of the time..working in almost all cases isn't good enough. >=20 > Ah, the noble strive for perfect software. Good luck, then. Well, as I said, I have a prototype that works except for an unrelated bug. > Btw, a simple example where the make(1) approach fails: >=20 >=20 > .if exsists (my.make.file) > .include "my.make.file" > .endif >=20 > ... and my.make.file is added in an later commit. Of course > I can construct increasingly complex examples where patching > make(1) simply fails. So much for 100% accuracy. Which port does this? Kris --LZvS9be/3tNcYl/X Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFA2BxWWry0BWjoQKURAgyCAJ9nihVZscbZeDe/qcFxm5bMIgOeCACdFXLL zIbur9hVOWb2g+nrK9k5GwM= =Ap9t -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --LZvS9be/3tNcYl/X--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040622114734.GA14959>