From owner-freebsd-current Wed May 14 12:18:14 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id MAA28944 for current-outgoing; Wed, 14 May 1997 12:18:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dyslexic.phoenix.net (dyslexic.phoenix.net [199.3.233.7]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id MAA28939 for ; Wed, 14 May 1997 12:18:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (gemohler@localhost) by dyslexic.phoenix.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id OAA03986; Wed, 14 May 1997 14:15:58 -0500 (CDT) X-Authentication-Warning: dyslexic.phoenix.net: gemohler owned process doing -bs Date: Wed, 14 May 1997 14:15:57 -0500 (CDT) From: Geoff Mohler X-Sender: gemohler@dyslexic.phoenix.net To: David Nugent cc: "Jordan K. Hubbard" , current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: RELENG_2_2 In-Reply-To: <199705141817.EAA01334@labs.usn.blaze.net.au> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Thu, 15 May 1997, David Nugent wrote: > I've only got one query. > > What happens when a user loses mail or has his/her mailbox > trashed when there is a locking collision/race caused by > dtmail and the local delivery agent using different locking > methods? > > This is the real problem. Like many, I've been bitten by this > when simply accessing a mailbox via nfs. It won't happen often, > but it surely will. I agree. We currently serve over 50,000 customers from Houston to Lima, Peru on FreeBSD, and most of them access Email via NFS. Procmail has worked very well for us an I would hate to see it broken.