From owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 2 16:44:37 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A83F37B401 for ; Wed, 2 Jul 2003 16:44:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from community2.interfree.it (community2.interfree.it [213.158.72.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2C20343F75 for ; Wed, 2 Jul 2003 16:44:36 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from victorvittorivonwiktow@interfree.it) Received: (qmail 13499 invoked from network); 2 Jul 2003 23:44:35 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO workstation) (80.104.111.72) by mail.interfree.it with SMTP; 2 Jul 2003 23:44:35 -0000 Message-ID: <000e01c340f3$ea2aa600$486f6850@workstation> From: ".VWV." To: References: <4D5D9440-AC53-11D7-B3D4-003065A70D30@shire.net> Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2003 00:44:43 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Subject: Re: sata versus ultra160 using 10k enterprise type drives X-BeenThere: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion of FreeBSD hardware List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2003 23:44:37 -0000 Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC wrote: > > I was wondering if anyone had any sort of comparison on performance in > a raid 1 or a raid 5 (4 drives) type configuration comparing a typical > U160 setup to the enterprise level SATA setup. > > Server use is for web and email serving etc. > > thanks > Chad > I recommend you to check also the ICP Vortex SCSI-RAID controllers. It seems ICP products - at least U160 - are completely compatible with FreeBSD, by means of an unique driver. I have bought a two-channel controller, but I'm far from finishing the machine which will fit it. VITTORI