From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Feb 13 19:29:58 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0025937B401 for ; Thu, 13 Feb 2003 19:29:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from snafu.adept.org (adsl-67-117-158-73.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net [67.117.158.73]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6041243F75 for ; Thu, 13 Feb 2003 19:29:56 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mike@adept.org) Received: by snafu.adept.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 700109F01F; Thu, 13 Feb 2003 19:29:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by snafu.adept.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6754E9B060 for ; Thu, 13 Feb 2003 19:29:44 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2003 19:29:44 -0800 (PST) From: Mike Hoskins To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ipfw1 or ipfw2 in STABLE? In-Reply-To: <97321400.1045177521@[192.168.0.2]> Message-ID: <20030213192753.O54902-100000@snafu.adept.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, 13 Feb 2003, Eivind Olsen wrote: > I'm tracking RELENG_4 (STABLE). > Now, I'm not sure if it comes with ipfw1 or ipfw2 as default. Reading the > man-page for ipfw(8) I get the impression that STABLE only uses ipfw1 by > default and I'll have to enable ipfw2 by adding "IPFW2=TRUE" to > /etc/make.conf and adding "options IPFW2" to the kernel config. FWIW, In -stable as of Feb 10 I've got IPFW2 running on a couple boxes following what the man page describes... 'options IPFW2' in kernel config and 'IPFW2=TRUE' in make.conf. Seems to work. Perhaps the make.conf bit will become unnecessary when 5.x-stable becomes available, hence the lack of a LINT entry? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message