From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 29 14:33:21 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 905D616A4CE for ; Sun, 29 Feb 2004 14:33:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from gidgate.gid.co.uk (gid.co.uk [194.32.164.225]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C45C243D2D for ; Sun, 29 Feb 2004 14:33:20 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from rb@gid.co.uk) Received: (from rb@localhost) by gidgate.gid.co.uk (8.11.7/8.11.6) id i1TMXBs65902; Sun, 29 Feb 2004 22:33:11 GMT (envelope-from rb) Message-Id: <6.0.3.0.2.20040229222941.035b9db0@gid.co.uk> X-Sender: rbmail@gid.co.uk (Unverified) X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.0.3.0 Date: Sun, 29 Feb 2004 22:33:00 +0000 To: Mike Tancsa From: Bob Bishop Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: bad em NIC or new unrecognized NIC ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Feb 2004 22:33:21 -0000 Hi again, At 19:57 26/2/04, Mike Tancsa wrote: >At 02:26 PM 26/02/2004, Bob Bishop wrote: >>Hi, >> >>At 18:25 26/2/04, Mike Tancsa wrote: >>> >>>em0: The EEPROM Checksum Is Not Valid [etc] >> >>FWIW I get something very similar under 5.2.1-RC2 on my shiny new >>ThinkPad T41, so it's likely just not recognised. > >Actually, I worked around the problem by swapping its location with an fxp >next to it. For some reason the em does not seem to like sharing its >interrupt with agp0 ? The fxp seems happy enough to do it however. On my T41, hw.pci.allow_unsupported_io_range="1" in /boot/loader.conf fixed it, so maybe the IRQ wasn't the problem. -- Bob Bishop +44 (0)118 977 4017 rb@gid.co.uk fax +44 (0)118 989 4254