From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Oct 30 14: 2:40 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from winston.osd.bsdi.com (winston.osd.bsdi.com [204.216.27.229]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC76437B479; Mon, 30 Oct 2000 14:02:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from winston.osd.bsdi.com (jkh@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by winston.osd.bsdi.com (8.11.1/8.9.3) with ESMTP id e9UM2UU07874; Mon, 30 Oct 2000 14:02:31 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jkh@winston.osd.bsdi.com) To: Roman Shterenzon Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, "Daniel M. Eischen" , jkh@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Is it late already? (-pthread) In-Reply-To: Message from Roman Shterenzon of "Mon, 30 Oct 2000 14:37:22 +0200." Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2000 14:02:30 -0800 Message-ID: <7870.972943350@winston.osd.bsdi.com> From: Jordan Hubbard Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > The pthreads in RELENG_4 are quite broken (I mean, very-very broken). > Daniel M. Eischen has produced some patches which are > in -current for some time now, and were tested by me in -stable. > They were found to work great for all things I've tested it on. > It works *better* than the original implementation _anyway_, which is, > like I said is broken. I'd be perfectly happy to see Dan MFC any pthread fixes, especially ones which appear to have been alrady well-tested and shown to fix serious breakage in -current. Lacking any specific revision numbers or even filenames to look at in this email, however, I'm also going to have to leave the work to Dan and I'll even give him post-freeze permission to do it on the condition that he not leave it too late. ;) - Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message