From owner-cvs-sys  Mon Mar  4 16:22:26 1996
Return-Path: owner-cvs-sys
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id QAA11617
          for cvs-sys-outgoing; Mon, 4 Mar 1996 16:22:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [192.216.222.226])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id QAA11604
          Mon, 4 Mar 1996 16:22:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.7.4/8.6.9) with SMTP id QAA24495; Mon, 4 Mar 1996 16:20:35 -0800 (PST)
To: Peter Wemm <peter@jhome.dialix.com>
cc: J Wunsch <j@uriah.heep.sax.de>, gpalmer@freefall.freebsd.org (Gary Palmer),
        CVS-committers@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-all@freefall.freebsd.org,
        cvs-sys@freefall.freebsd.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/i386/conf LINT src/sys/kern subr_prf.c 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 04 Mar 1996 19:09:30 +0800."
             <199603041109.TAA02681@jhome.DIALix.COM> 
Date: Mon, 04 Mar 1996 16:20:35 -0800
Message-ID: <24493.825985235@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-cvs-sys@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk

> I agree.. It is amazingly simple to add sysctl variables after PHK's upgrade
> of the sysctl code.  It's now as simple as adding two (or three) lines to the
> code..  One #include, an int variable and a SYSCTL_INT(.. OID_AUTO..) line.

Hmmmm.  Can you add new variables at runtime, or is an NT-style
registry still going to be a necessary evil for unifying the kernel
dynamic information?

					Jordan