From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 11 16:29:17 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07FA037B401 for ; Sun, 11 May 2003 16:29:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (trang.nuxi.com [66.93.134.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5099643FD7 for ; Sun, 11 May 2003 16:29:16 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from obrien@NUXI.com) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (obrien@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h4BNSvm2066869; Sun, 11 May 2003 16:28:57 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from obrien@dragon.nuxi.com) Received: (from obrien@localhost) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h4BNSvx6066868; Sun, 11 May 2003 16:28:57 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 11 May 2003 16:28:57 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" To: "M. Warner Losh" Message-ID: <20030511232857.GB66670@dragon.nuxi.com> References: <200305081617.h48GHcZT008633@arch20m.dellroad.org> <20030509154304.GC61844@dragon.nuxi.com> <20030511.103412.15266142.imp@bsdimp.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030511.103412.15266142.imp@bsdimp.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT Organization: The NUXI BSD Group X-Pgp-Rsa-Fingerprint: B7 4D 3E E9 11 39 5F A3 90 76 5D 69 58 D9 98 7A X-Pgp-Rsa-Keyid: 1024/34F9F9D5 cc: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: `Hiding' libc symbols X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 May 2003 23:29:17 -0000 On Sun, May 11, 2003 at 10:34:12AM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote: > In message: <20030509154304.GC61844@dragon.nuxi.com> > "David O'Brien" writes: > : On Thu, May 08, 2003 at 01:20:28PM -0400, Daniel Eischen wrote: > : > At any rate, can we please put this thread to rest until > : > Jacques comes back from vacation? It doesn't make sense > : > arguing about it when the main proponent of it is not > : > here. > : > : This thread doesn't make sense regardless of who is on vacation. Those > : of us opposed to this change have shown enough opposition that there will > : not be a consisenses on this issue. (at least not this go around) This > : thread should just die period. > > No you haven't shown that opposition. You've just shown that you can > be loud and not have a full command of the facts of the situation. We > already hide some of the symbols. Geeze Geeze what are you talking about? You don't think there is opposition to Jacques commit and anything like it? Do I need to list all the names of us that didn't like the commit that started all this? So what if some symbols are already hidden. I and other don't like that either -- but it seems we have to tolerate that for a threading library. "loud", "full command"... if you think there is or can be any consisenses of this issue in the freebsd-arch@ list, you haven't been reading the thread. Do you really think this issue can be settled in this forum right now?? Geeze. -- David