From owner-freebsd-standards@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Apr 11 12:44:31 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-standards@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-standards@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 899D837B401
	for <standards@freebsd.org>; Fri, 11 Apr 2003 12:44:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from harmony.village.org (rover.bsdimp.com [204.144.255.66])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C111B43F93
	for <standards@freebsd.org>; Fri, 11 Apr 2003 12:44:30 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com)
Received: from localhost (warner@rover2.village.org [10.0.0.1])
	by harmony.village.org (8.12.8/8.12.3) with ESMTP id h3BJiTA7029969
	for <standards@freebsd.org>; Fri, 11 Apr 2003 13:44:29 -0600 (MDT)
	(envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com)
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2003 13:44:16 -0600 (MDT)
Message-Id: <20030411.134416.71552075.imp@bsdimp.com>
To: standards@freebsd.org
From: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com>
X-Mailer: Mew version 2.1 on Emacs 21.2 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Non-compliant FreeBSD behavior?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-standards@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Standards compliance <freebsd-standards.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-standards>,
	<mailto:freebsd-standards-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-standards>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-standards@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-standards-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-standards>,
	<mailto:freebsd-standards-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2003 19:44:31 -0000

A number of places I've seen says that the BUGGY section should be
identical to the else part.  That is, setting O_NONBLOCK via fcntl
should result in the same behavior as setting it using FIONBIO.
However, I've observed that for both threaded and unthreaded programs
the BUGGY part doesn't work, while the other part does.  Is there
something subtle I'm missing?  What do the standards have to say about
this?

Warner

#include <sys/types.h>
#include <sys/ioctl.h>
#include <sys/socket.h>
#include <netinet/in.h>
#include <arpa/inet.h>
#include <err.h>
#include <fcntl.h>
#include <stdio.h>

int main(void)
{
    int fd;
    struct in_addr addr;
    struct sockaddr_in sa;
    int flags;

    fd = socket(PF_INET, SOCK_STREAM, 0);
    inet_aton("1.2.3.4", &addr);

    sa.sin_len = sizeof(sa);
    sa.sin_family = AF_INET;
    sa.sin_port = htons(1234);
    memcpy(&sa.sin_addr, &addr, sizeof(addr));
#if BUGGY
    flags = fcntl(fd, F_GETFL, NULL);
    flags |= O_NONBLOCK;
    if (fcntl(fd, F_SETFL, &flags) == -1) 
	err(1, "fcntl");
#else
    flags = 1;
    if (ioctl(fd, FIONBIO, &flags))
	err(1, "ioctl");
#endif
    if (connect(fd, (struct sockaddr *) &sa, sizeof(sa)))
	err(1, "connect");
    exit(0);
}