Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 4 May 2017 14:18:04 +0200
From:      Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org>
To:        scratch65535@att.net
Cc:        Matthew Seaman <m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk>, freebsd-ports <ports@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: pkg and packages
Message-ID:  <20170504121804.m3etxqgksvdjw3rq@ivaldir.net>
In-Reply-To: <qm2mgc9hdu4cl5ddasnk8albkg0ncj9osn@4ax.com>
References:  <chgjgc91bp3vu3aufg8p9cavrp7iehvhei@4ax.com> <d903c4aa02b629b5d22cedc62ac33031@ultimatedns.net> <2c69cd39-2cd2-3b6d-a2e0-f28a9fda7e05@infracaninophile.co.uk> <qm2mgc9hdu4cl5ddasnk8albkg0ncj9osn@4ax.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--k25eapnxq33bp5o7
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thu, May 04, 2017 at 08:09:47AM -0400, scratch65535@att.net wrote:
> On Wed, 3 May 2017 16:53:41 +0100, Matthew Seaman
> <m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk> wrote:
>=20
> >>> Trying to install the desktop package, I discovered that it's
> >>> bundled with at least 2 unrelated pieces of software:  Thunar,
> >>> and samba44.  That bothered me, but I needed the desktop.
> >
> >'Bundling' isn't the right term -- Thunar and samba44 are /dependencies/
> >of the xfce4-desktop.  That is: other packages that need to be installed
> >before the package in question will work.  Sorting out dependency trees
> >like this is much of what pkg(8) exists for.
>=20
> I can't imagine what code could possibly be in thunar and samba
> that the xfce desktop would need, particularly since the desktop
> is very simple, and also because I've never got samba
> functionality for free after installing xfce which if you're
> right I should have done.  But I'll check on that, and report
> back. =20
>=20
> That kind of tight coupling at the macro level *is* a very
> serious problem for the ports system, though.  It's strangling
> it.
>=20
> How many ports just build, first go?  Are there *any*?  I suspect
> not.  And yet the maintainers presumably thought they would.
>=20
> I stopped trying to build ports because I could never get a make
> to run to completion.  There was always at least one dependency
> that (a) couldn't be found at all, (b) was the wrong version, or
> (c) failed compilation.  That didn't happen when I was writing
> stuff under sco or sys v.
>=20
> It shouldn't happen with our ports system, either, because it
> completely prevents code freeze and stability, a basic
> requirement for high-quality software.   The stuff being fetched
> from Timbuktu or somebody's cat's litter box should be cleaned
> up, built into a library, and be fetched from there subsequently.
> There should never be a dependency on code that the ports project
> doesn't control. =20
>=20
>=20
> >The thing that seems to trip most people up is thinking they can
> >substitute some other package instead of the exact dependency listed in
> >the package metadata.  This is not an unreasonable request, especially
> >when you know your alternate package does exactly the same thing as the
> >one you want to replace.  Unfortunately it just doesn't work right now,
> >and it would take quite a lot of disruptive change in the ports tree and
> >to pkg(8) itself to make that happen.
>=20
> You call it "disruptive" change, but from  here it looks exactly
> like *healthy*, *professional* change.  Really.

There is no garanty the libsmb.so.X provided by samba44 is binary compatible
with the one from samba46 this is why there is a strong dependency here.

For more defaly look at my answer here
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D219036

Bapt

--k25eapnxq33bp5o7
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=jOAt
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--k25eapnxq33bp5o7--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20170504121804.m3etxqgksvdjw3rq>