From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Mar 23 22:05:21 2006
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97E1B16A400;
	Thu, 23 Mar 2006 22:05:21 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from itetcu@people.tecnik93.com)
Received: from it.buh.tecnik93.com (it.buh.tecnik93.com [81.196.204.98])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6AEE43D77;
	Thu, 23 Mar 2006 22:05:15 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from itetcu@people.tecnik93.com)
Received: from it.buh.tecnik93.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by it.buh.tecnik93.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAEE117A1A;
	Fri, 24 Mar 2006 00:04:58 +0200 (EET)
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2006 00:04:56 +0200
From: Ion-Mihai Tetcu <itetcu@people.tecnik93.com>
To: pav@FreeBSD.org
Message-ID: <20060324000456.37491373@it.buh.tecnik93.com>
In-Reply-To: <1143150642.16820.0.camel@ikaros.oook.cz>
References: <200603232120.k2NLKK1L028417@freefall.freebsd.org>
	<20060323232946.0a74eb0f@it.buh.tecnik93.com>
	<1143149515.13406.0.camel@ikaros.oook.cz>
	<20060323233510.4e9a094b@it.buh.tecnik93.com>
	<20060323234103.1ed195e9@it.buh.tecnik93.com>
	<1143150642.16820.0.camel@ikaros.oook.cz>
X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.0.0 (GTK+ 2.8.16; i386-portbld-freebsd6.1)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: ports/94880: [PATCH] x11/portoseguro: porlint
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Ports bug reports <freebsd-ports-bugs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports-bugs>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports-bugs>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports-bugs>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 22:05:21 -0000

On Thu, 23 Mar 2006 22:50:42 +0100
Pav Lucistnik <pav@FreeBSD.org> wrote:

> Ion-Mihai Tetcu p=C3=AD=C5=A1e v =C4=8Dt 23. 03. 2006 v 23:41 +0200:
> > On Thu, 23 Mar 2006 23:35:10 +0200
> > Ion-Mihai Tetcu <itetcu@people.tecnik93.com> wrote:
> >=20
> > > On Thu, 23 Mar 2006 22:31:55 +0100
> > > Pav Lucistnik <pav@FreeBSD.org> wrote:
> > >=20
> > > > > >  These PRs are quite useless; please try not to fill up our bug=
 database
> > > > > >  with mechanical style changes.
> > > > >=20
> > > > > You are talking about portlinting or also the others (WWW, MASTER=
_SITES) ?
> > > >=20
> > > > Portlinting, following obvious redirects in WWW.
> > >=20
> > > If you say so ...
> >=20
> > The problem will be when the initial URL won't redirect to the new one
> > anymore.
>=20
> I believe=20
>=20
> http://www.website.org/
>=20
> is better than
>=20
> http://www.website.org/cgi-bin/FancyWiki/FrontPage
>=20
> The first is gonna stay, the second can change suddenly.

Just that the user will have to search the page to find what he's
interested in; besides, not all redirects are in the same site.
=20
> I seen a PR with similar change from you today.

Yes.

Anyway, I could go watch last Lost ep. or something instead of
portlinting, etc.


--=20
IOnut - Unregistered ;) FreeBSD "user"
  "Intellectual Property" is   nowhere near as valuable   as "Intellect"

BOFH excuse #275:
Bit rot