From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 22 07:16:19 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BB3C16A4CE for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 07:16:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dave.horsfall.org (mrdavi2.lnk.telstra.net [139.130.75.233]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F3E343D2F for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 07:16:17 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dave@horsfall.org) Received: from localhost (dave@localhost) by dave.horsfall.org (8.11.4/8.11.4) with ESMTP id i3MEGEa09574 for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2004 00:16:15 +1000 (EST) Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2004 00:16:14 +1000 (EST) From: Dave Horsfall To: FreeBSD STABLE list In-Reply-To: <20040422102442.GU32710@submonkey.net> Message-ID: References: <20040422102442.GU32710@submonkey.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Subject: Re: Is 4.10-BETA stable? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 14:16:19 -0000 On Thu, 22 Apr 2004, Ceri Davies wrote: > > Are there any, umm, release notes for 4.10-BETA, so I can see what I'm > > in for? > > They're in src/release, but you do have STABLE. The "BETA" in 4.10-BETA > means that we're considering this code for release as 4.10-RELEASE, and > that's all. Many thanks. -- Dave, who remembers horrible Unices that weren't released but escaped...