From owner-freebsd-java Thu Feb 6 1:23:50 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB9AD37B401 for ; Thu, 6 Feb 2003 01:23:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from skywalker.creative.net.au (skywalker.creative.net.au [203.56.168.1]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AFC0B43F85 for ; Thu, 6 Feb 2003 01:23:47 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from freebsd@skywalker.creative.net.au) Received: (qmail 59052 invoked by uid 1008); 6 Feb 2003 09:23:40 -0000 Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2003 17:23:40 +0800 From: Adrian Chadd To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Subject: The billf debacle: a question Message-ID: <20030206092340.GA58964@skywalker.creative.net.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org As a completely unrelated party interested in the whole billh thread I'd like to ask for any evidence supporting billh's claim to involvement/work with the java project. (Evidence being commit logs, email logs, etc - billh, this is your oppertunity to post to me, privately, any email supporting your statements. I won't pass them to anyone at all.) I'm not trolling or such here - I agree that billh's behaviour on the list and privately (eg towards jdp) is definitely uncalled for and does not reflect upon him well. So far I can't see any evidence for or against the work that he's done which seems to have been mostly forgotten in the freebsd-java postings I've seen. Thanks and here's my 2c, Adrian -- Adrian Chadd learning is bad it just makes the people around you dumber (angryskul == alfred@irc) :( To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-java" in the body of the message